EOIR / Immigration Judge
Immigration Judge Chew, George T. - New York - Federal Plaza Immigration Court - Asylum Decision Statistics
EOIR's FOIA data release does not report a trailing 12-month asylum grant rate for Immigration Judge Chew, George T. at the New York - Federal Plaza Immigration Court. Across the 5821 decisions on record from February 1998 to September 2019, the asylum grant rate was 80.5%.
Free, Confidential Case Review
Have a case before Judge Chew?
These are past statistics, not a prediction of your case. Leave your name and number for a free, confidential review from an immigration attorney.
Latest 12-month grant rate
Asylum decisions, trailing 12 months
Lifetime total cases
All recorded asylum decisions
FY2025 court average
Complete fiscal year: Oct 2024 – Sep 2025
Court average before the 2025 change
FY2024 baseline: Oct 2023 – Sep 2024
FY2024 was the last full fiscal year before the January 2025 asylum-policy changes, so it is kept fixed as a before-and-after baseline rather than updated. More cases now close administratively, which shifts the merit-decision mix and is why the later figures are much lower.
Last data refresh
From Deportation Data Project FOIA release
Monthly grant-rate trend
| Month | Grant rate |
|---|---|
| 2014-10 | 87.5% |
| 2014-11 | 92.0% |
| 2014-12 | 100.0% |
| 2015-01 | 96.4% |
| 2015-02 | 81.3% |
| 2015-03 | 87.5% |
| 2015-04 | 91.3% |
| 2015-05 | 86.7% |
| 2015-06 | 95.0% |
| 2015-07 | 86.7% |
| 2015-08 | 83.3% |
| 2015-09 | 84.6% |
| 2015-10 | 80.0% |
| 2015-11 | 84.9% |
| 2015-12 | 83.3% |
| 2016-01 | 100.0% |
| 2016-02 | 81.0% |
| 2016-03 | 90.0% |
| 2016-04 | 97.6% |
| 2016-05 | 93.3% |
| 2016-06 | 96.3% |
| 2016-07 | 60.0% |
| 2016-08 | 100.0% |
| 2016-09 | 95.5% |
| 2016-10 | 92.0% |
| 2016-11 | 84.6% |
| 2016-12 | 85.0% |
| 2017-01 | 69.2% |
| 2017-02 | 88.9% |
| 2017-03 | 82.3% |
| 2017-04 | 88.2% |
| 2017-05 | 97.3% |
| 2017-06 | 93.9% |
| 2017-09 | 100.0% |
| 2019-08 | 100.0% |
| 2019-09 | 100.0% |
These statistics describe past asylum decisions, not a prediction of any individual case. Your options depend on the specific facts of your case.